Skip to main content

The Next Phase

I can play through both my main pieces now. Both Bare Necessities and Rondo alla Turca are fully memorized, and I've worked out the various kinks of learning the notes. Even the tricky BN outro has come together ... mostly.

It's been a slow with Bare Necessities. The Mozart hasn't been so bad, but it's still tricky because all those 16th notes need to be absolutely even. And I still haven't discovered the secret of playing those broken octaves in the right hand effectively.

And both pieces are fast. The Mozart is a nice Allegro that I'd like to have at about 120 to 130. And Bare Necessities? I think the stride section is supposed to be around 200, though Jonny plays it faster. And the whole piece following the stride section is faster, though I don't really like it that fast, so I may keep it all at the same tempo, or at least not speed it up as much as he does in his video.

Time for the Next Phase

So. Now that I have the notes down and have at least begun thinking about dynamics, phrasing, and articulation, it's time to progress a new phase: The Metronome Phase.

I don't like the Metronome Phase. Too often, I've stuck with the metronome for a while ... but then I get tired of it. And I forget about it. And the piece gets sloppy, so I return to the metronome.

(I also can't really hear the metronome, so I have to depend on seeing the little light flash on my digital piano metronome, or seeing the arm swing on my wind-up one.)

Anyway, this time I want to do things ... differently. I started to type "right," but is there really a right way? This time, I want to find the metronome settings at which I can play each of these perfectly. I want to play them several times at that setting, and then move up just a notch or two ... and then adjust and do whatever drills I need to do until I can play them at those settings perfectly.

By the time I get to the target tempos, in a month or six weeks or however long it takes, I'll have played each piece dozens of times. Maybe even 100 times. Or more.

This is, to my understanding, how you're supposed to do this. I've rarely had the patience. But I want to stick with it this time because I really want to play both of these pieces well.

Tonight I'll figure out my "baseline" tempos and report them here. And then I'll track my progress!

Labels

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

March Goals Recap/Looking Ahead to April

It's April 1, and time to revisit the goals I set for last month. I practiced a total of 50.45 hours in March, averaging 1.62 hours (or just over an hour and a half) per day. Realistically, I practice about 45 minutes to an hour a day on weekdays, and I usually get at least one longer practice (or multiple shorter practices) in on one or both days of the weekend to bring the average up. CLASSICAL GOALS Chopin, F Minor Nocturne March Goal: Have entire piece by memory and performance-ready. I have about 90% of the piece by memory, but I still have some work to do before it's performance-ready. The only two sections that I don't quite have are "The Agitation" and the "stretto" section with the seventh chords. I'll work on both this week and will have them both memorized before the weekend. April Goal: Finish memorizing, and polish, polish, polish! My focus now is really on phrasing and dynamics. I have the notes down, even in the difficult passages. Fro...
Post a Comment
Read more

Thursday, July 13

I worked in a short practice today. Had piano this afternoon. The short practice involved the usual scales and arps, and a run-through of my pieces. It wasn't so much a practice as a review. Piano was good. She said that the Bach sounded very musical. I asked what I should do next, practice-wise--continue drilling and memorizing HS, or start HT? She said that I "shouldn't hold off any longer" on playing HT, and to keep drilling HS if I want but to begin working HT on whatever I find to be the most difficult passage of the fugue. That's easy. I don't have the music in front of me, but in the Alfred edition, it's the bottom of page two. I played the Liszt pretty well, if a bit timidly. I'm playing it with emotion and paying attention to all of the dynamics and all of that, but I'm still also trying to make sure I get the notes right in several sections. She had all kinds of nice things to say about the Liszt. The 9-against-4 is sounding much better (...
Post a Comment
Read more

I Need an Intermediate Piece

Deborah wants me to pick out an intermediate piece to start learning next week. I went to the ARCT Syllabus guide that Robert so graciously sent me and looked up all of the pieces that I considered "intermediate." They were mostly Grade 6 and Grade 7. Not intermediate enough. I looked up my Beethoven Sonatina in G, my most recent intermediate piece. It's a Grade 3--a very early intermediate. So I'm looking for something in the Grade 4-5 category. And I'd kind of like to work on one of those pieces that everyone loves to hear--Fur Elise, Chopin's Em prelude, the Brahms waltz in Ab--all pieces I learned in junior high, but pieces that I'd like to re-learn, and learn to play well , and not like my junior-high self, whose heart wasn't in the music. And they are pieces I love, and that others love hearing as well. Hmm. Fur Elise is Grade 7. The Chopin Prelude is Grade 8. The Brahms Waltz is Grade 8. Too advanced for an intermediate piece? I'll talk it ...
3 comments
Read more