Picking Up the Pieces

As part of Day 5 of Rebecca Bogart ’s Learn New Repertoire Faster challenge , the focus is supposed to be speed. I’m not there yet. Nowhere close. I do use her tempo-building techniques in other work—I leaned on them quite a bit in Pineapple Rag , and I’ll be using them tonight on After You’ve Gone as I prep for the graduation video . But for OTJ, speed is going to have to wait. Day 5 Today we leave Batch 1 behind and begin Batch 2. Batch 1 included the eight-measure intro and the sixteen-measure A/A′ section. (There are also two more A sections later—A″ and A‴—so I guess I got a head start on those as well.) Batch 2 consists of: Passage 1: B section (8 measures) Passage 2: solo A section, part 1 (4 measures) Passage 3: solo A section, part 2 (4 measures) The solo A section is firmly red (difficult), so I’m breaking it into smaller chunks. It has eight additional measures I'll address in Batch 3 next week. This Morning’s Practice: Passage 1 I originally marked Passage 1 as gree...

As part of Day 4 of Rebecca Bogart’s Learn New Repertoire Faster challenge, the focus was on identifying leaps and taking steps to make them more reliable. It’s fair to say that the stride arrangement of Ode to Joy has its share of leaps. 🙂 Day 4 The left-hand leaps didn’t get much attention today. They show up in almost every measure, but they’re not a major concern for me because I am the ragtime queen (she writes modestly). Right-hand leaps are a different story. There aren’t many in Batch 1, but there is one spot where the right hand jumps up an octave to begin a short descending run, and that one deserves attention. Today's Wins My biggest win today was locking in the eight-measure intro . It’s not especially difficult, but there are a couple of spots that needed work—the move from A9 to Em7 in the left hand, and the final measure with the augmented chord. I focused on those trouble spots using 3b3 (play three times slowly, take a short break, then repeat). Once those felt...

A few days ago, I set a hard deadline for After You’ve Gone . My plan is to make the graduation video this weekend and be done with it. After a few months of working on it, that feels like the right call. I’ve learned so much—stride tenths, coordination, some improvisation vocabulary—and I even used some of the ideas in YAMS . By any reasonable standard, the Piano With Jonny "After You've Gone" course has done its job. There's still a part of me that really wants to be able to perform  it, and that's where my struggle has been for the past few weeks. And I feel like I'm not even close. I Think This Is What Happens When a Piece Is Too Hard This piece has never quite settled for me. The arrangement section still feels slippery. I can play the rolling tenths, but it feels like my fingers are wearing roller skates—nothing is fully grounded. (Maybe it's my smaller-than-average hands.) And even though I switch to the easier four-on-the-floor for the solo/improv...

As I work through Rebecca Bogart's Learn New Repertoire Faster challenge , I'll be posting more extended updates here on my blog. Days 1–3 Day 1 was analysis, listening, and generally scoping out the territory of the music . The road trip to Florida last week turned out to be Day 1, even if I didn't label it that way at the time. Day 2 was fingering and the start of my first "batch": measures 0-7 (intro), 8-15 (Section A), and 16-23 (Section A'). Day 3 (today) was about recognizing patterns and continuing work on Batch 1. Batch 1: Intro, A, A' The intro isn't difficult, and it will likely be one of the two easiest sections in this piece. Still, the syncopation is a little tricky, so I took some extra time with it. I've already memorized it, as the chord progression is pretty straightforward and the melody is just a single line (no harmony notes). There is one big augmented chord at the end that required some focused work. Sections A and A' ar...

In today's live Q&A, Jonny May said something that stuck with me, and not in a good way: "If a piece takes you more than two months to learn, it’s probably too hard for you." Hoo boy. That didn’t sit well. I can’t even remember the last time I learned anything in under two months unless it was something relatively simple, like the Chopin A minor waltz. My immediate reaction was: Wait… am I constantly working on pieces that are too hard? My previous (classical) teachers took almost the opposite approach. Deborah , in particular, encouraged me to reach beyond my limits—to stretch, to struggle a bit, to take on things that felt just out of reach. And I do think that made me better. But I also have to admit something: I’ve been struggling a lot. The Case of After You’ve Gone First of all, After You've Gone wasn’t meant to be a performance piece. It was supposed to be a training piece—a way to work on stride, coordination, and improvisation. Here’s how that went: It t...

Folks, I’m getting close. I'm not there yet, but something has finally shifted with the solo section. It's like I’ve been on a long C-curve, improving at a glacial pace, and then suddenly… it’s starting to sound like music. I’m still under tempo, but even when I push it a bit, the crashes and freeze-ups are happening far less often. What’s really encouraging is that I’ve started to build a small vocabulary—riffs, I suppose—that I can rely on for certain progressions. I’ve got a couple for F6–Fm6, one cheeky one for C6–F7, and a nice descending idea for Em7–A7. I move into syncopated blocked chords for both C6–E7–Am7–D7 and Gm7–C9, and I’ve got two riffs that work over Dm7–G7. For everything else, I’m mostly outlining the chord or using blocked chords, but even there, a few ideas are starting to show up. This has been a bit of a lightbulb moment. The riffs aren’t just “nice ideas”; they're doing real work, reducing real cognitive load. Instead of trying to invent something f...