Skip to main content

Dynamic Percentages

I'm watching a Tonebase crash course on dynamics, and the instructor, Dr. Leann Osterkamp He, talks about assigning dynamics percentages to each note in a piece. You begin by determining what volume (i.e., how much weight on the keys) will be your "50%" dynamic. Essentially, this would be the half-way point between what you expect to be your loudest and your softest notes in the piece. From there, you assign each note the percentage dynamic that you want to give it when you play.

I have never thought about dynamics and phrasing in this kind of detail! Phrasing was just always what felt right ... but could I guarantee that I would use the same phrasing every time I played something, or anything close to the same phrasing? No. I mean, it would be similar, but I've never played with a number in mind of, "When I play this note, I want it to be at this weight of my arm."

I'm traveling this weekend and don't have access to a real (or even a digital) piano, so I won't be able to practice at all until Saturday night. Waaaah. But what I can do is listen to other pianists playing my Chopin Nocturne, and get a sense of what percentages they are using.

I did this for about a half-hour on the drive to North Carolina this morning, and it was enlightening, to say the least. I can't say for sure, but it sounded like some of the pianists had a clear sense of where their phrasings and dynamics were going, where others had less of a clear sense.

I brought my old Chopin book, so I think I'm going to run a couple of copies of the first dozen or so measures and write percentages for several different recordings. It's so interesting, and educational, to see the various choices that the different pianists made. Here's a bit of what I wrote for Rubinstein. It took a while, so I'm rethinking the plan of doing this for multiple recordings!



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Rusty Lock and Key

I'm in a room. There's a door in front of me. On the other side of that door is a whole world of adventure and imagination and joy and delight, but for the moment, I'm locked in this gray little room. The door itself has a lock that is all rusted. I've tried to open it in the past, but I've never gotten very far. Sometimes I try to scrape the rust off the lock. I also have a rusty old key that I occasionally try to polish. Each time, after I've made a little progress, I'll put it into the keyhole in hopes of opening the door. It turns a half a millimeter or so, but the brief excitement at my progress dies quickly when I realize, once again, the lock isn't opening. I set the old key aside, and from there I can forget about the door, the lock, and the world outside, for months—years, even. But then something happens—I hear birdsong, or I catch a glimpse of color—and I pick up the key and start picking away at the stubborn rust. That dark little room is my ...

March Goals Recap/Looking Ahead to April

It's April 1, and time to revisit the goals I set for last month. I practiced a total of 50.45 hours in March, averaging 1.62 hours (or just over an hour and a half) per day. Realistically, I practice about 45 minutes to an hour a day on weekdays, and I usually get at least one longer practice (or multiple shorter practices) in on one or both days of the weekend to bring the average up. CLASSICAL GOALS Chopin, F Minor Nocturne March Goal: Have entire piece by memory and performance-ready. I have about 90% of the piece by memory, but I still have some work to do before it's performance-ready. The only two sections that I don't quite have are "The Agitation" and the "stretto" section with the seventh chords. I'll work on both this week and will have them both memorized before the weekend. April Goal: Finish memorizing, and polish, polish, polish! My focus now is really on phrasing and dynamics. I have the notes down, even in the difficult passages. Fro...

Feb. 9 Practice

My February 9 practice was short and sweet. I worked only on the Liszt, playing in rhythms. Do you know how hard it is to play a piece in rhythms when the LH is even and the RH is all over the place, with 2-against-3 and later with 4-against-9? Don't worry--I'm not trying to be impeccably exact when I'm doing rhythms. And I've discovered what a *rut* I've gotten into with the Liszt. It's so beautiful, and part of me is content just to play it through, again and again, and be done with it. But rhythms are forcing me to look at the seamy underside, at the 0's and 1's that make this piece what it is. And it's not an altogether pleasant experience. But it's waking me up. The beauty of this piece has lulled me into a sort of sleepy complacency when I play it. I think that's why Deborah said not to play the piece through a single time this week. It is so tempting to just play it through and listen to the beautiful music. But when I do that, I'm...