Skip to main content

Op. 9, No. 1, Measure 73

I learned Chopin's B-flat minor Nocturne using the Schirmer edition, favorite edition of broke college students everywhere. When Deborah and I were going to work on the F-minor Nocturne (which I barely started before I had to quit), she had me get the Alfred edition. So when I decided to do a chord analysis of the whole piece (B-flat minor, I mean), I pulled out the Alfred since it wasn't covered with fingering, jotted notes, and other scribbles.

When I sat down to get the piece from memory a couple of weeks ago, I went back to Schirmer. Here's measure 73, which I'm still working on getting "just right."


So the Schirmer and the Alfred are both lying around. When I sat down to work on measure 73 today, I grabbed the version that was closest at hand: the Alfred. Here's measure 73 of the Alfred:


I have the measure 73 polyrhythms down for the most part, but I'm not confident about them. When they come together properly, it feels like more a stroke of luck than something I've consciously executed. So for today's practice, I wanted to see if I could make that "stroke of luck" be more consistent. So I looked at my Alfred edition, to remind myself of how many RH notes I'd practiced for each LH note.

And ... something was different. The Alfred edition is not like the Schirmer edition. And neither of them are the official Urtext edition, at least as far as I know.

In Schirmer, the first three triplets are 3-against-2 with the LH. After that, we have the rather-hard-to-digest 20-against-6, starting with the Bb in the right hand and a Bb2 (the Bb an octave below Middle C) in the left:


As noted above, that Bb2 is the first note of the second set in the LH, and the seventh note in the measure.

In Alfred, we have "3 against 1" for the initial three-note sets, and then the 20-note run starts on the fourth note of the measure, the Bb3:


Aaarrrggghhh.

So I did what I always do when I'm not sure about something in Chopin: Asked, "What would Artur do?"

Artur Rubinstein, 1962
So I listened. And ... it's kind of hard to tell.

I prefer the version I learned originally. I don't know if it matters that I play this many notes against that one note, or if I'm strict about anything as long as it's beautiful and comes together in the end. I'm just going to go with my instinct here. I'll continue working on having the progression of notes in both the RH and LH feel as natural as possible. This will allow me to think less about this note or that note, this beat or that beat, and just enjoy the flow of the music under my fingers.
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Rusty Lock and Key

I'm in a room. There's a door in front of me. On the other side of that door is a whole world of adventure and imagination and joy and delight, but for the moment, I'm locked in this gray little room. The door itself has a lock that is all rusted. I've tried to open it in the past, but I've never gotten very far. Sometimes I try to scrape the rust off the lock. I also have a rusty old key that I occasionally try to polish. Each time, after I've made a little progress, I'll put it into the keyhole in hopes of opening the door. It turns a half a millimeter or so, but the brief excitement at my progress dies quickly when I realize, once again, the lock isn't opening. I set the old key aside, and from there I can forget about the door, the lock, and the world outside, for months—years, even. But then something happens—I hear birdsong, or I catch a glimpse of color—and I pick up the key and start picking away at the stubborn rust. That dark little room is my ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Dance of the Digits

Note: I've expanded significantly on this post over at my other blog, A Sort of Notebook . I am loving Liszt. I love the way my hands have to "share" the melody. I have so much to write on that, but I'm borrowing a computer and don't have enough time to do it justice. Suffice it to say that I've practiced three and a half wonderful hours today, and about two hours on Liszt alone. What I find wonderful about Liszt is that it pushes one hand hard, but not too hard. Then the other hand gets a turn to be pushed. But it's never both at the same time, and never one hand for too long. It's hard to explain. When I have more time to write, I'll word things rather more eloquently, I'm sure. All I can say now is that my fingers feel like they're dancing a wonderful, graceful dance. I've been trying to "play with my body," as my piano teacher says to do, so all of me is dancing. And Standchen, though it still need a lot of work (like, um...
3 comments
Read more

The Amazing Practice Tracker 2.0: Leveling Up My Piano Game

(Apologies for the cheesy clip art. I needed to come up with something, or the Blogger template would show a fuzzy, overly-enlarged snippet of the first chart below.) When I showed my husband my piano practice tracker, he said I should market and sell it. Ha. It’s not for sale, but I’m excited to share how this tool has transformed my practice—and why it might inspire all three of my readers. Since my last post about the Amazing Practice Tracker, I’ve made it even better. Here’s a peek at how it works, using my June data. All The Pretty Colors, All the Pretty Winners My tracker now sparkles with color: darker shades for active pieces, lighter ones for maintenance, technique, and sight-reading. Each day, the piece I practice most gets a bright yellow highlight—a little “gold medal,” if you will. (Click image for a slightly larger view.) A leaderboard automatically shows the day’s top piece and time. And if that isn't enough, I keep track of the month's leaders--specifically, ho...
Post a Comment
Read more