Skip to main content

The Tracks of My Chopin

It has been a lovely morning. I woke up, did some writing, listened to some Horowitz, listened to Rubinstein playing my Nocturne, and then played for a few minutes myself, all before waking up the kid and getting her off to school.

Considering how little I've played in the past few weeks, and particularly how little I've played in the past 10 years, Op. 9 No. 1 is not sounding too bad. My new teacher may have  different opinion, but for now, I'm going with my own judgment. I feel like I don't have too far to go to get this into "recital" shape.

What's left?

  • Memorize. I have a lot of it by muscle memory, but I haven't actively worked on memorizing it.
  • Analyze. As a composer wanna-be, I want to look at every single unit of this piece and understand what makes each one what it is. This probably isn't a necessary step, but it's something I want to do.
  • Learn the notes. Ha ha. OK, so I already know the notes, but there are just a few areas where I'm stumbling. Here is the biggie:


This starts at about 4:13 in the Rubinstein recording linked above. I have the notes, and it's easy as pie to play this hands-separately. But put 'em together? My brain goes haywire.

Once upon a time, I could play this. So I know I have it in me. The tracks have been laid down in my brain somewhere. I just need to find them, or possibly re-lay them.

There are two other similar measures, but both of them are simpler. The second one isn't bad at all, just a series of 2-against-3. The first one, right at the beginning of the piece, is more challenging. I can play it, but I would like for it to be smoother.

As for the rest of the piece ... I have the notes, but I don't have the confidence of having the notes. That confidence will come with practice and memorization and probably those fun little analysis sessions I want to have. And as I gain more confidence, I'll be able to play with expression more consistently.

So maybe I have a longer way to go on this piece than I thought.

I should have three delicious hours for practicing tomorrow night. I'll spend some of that time on voice, but I'm also planning to spend a good chunk of it on this piece right here. I don't start my lessons for another week and a half, so I'm really not sure what to practice ... so I'm focusing on this one for now.

If you are really bored and read old posts from this blog and my A Sort of Notebook blog, you'll see that this piece has been with me a long time. Whenever I start dabbling in piano again, I come back to it. I've never totally lost it, but each time I've come back, I've been acutely aware that I have work to do if I want to get it back into recital shape. In years past, I haven't had the time or the energy to do that work. Now I do. (Not really. But it made for a nice concluding sentence.)

Labels

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

March Goals Recap/Looking Ahead to April

It's April 1, and time to revisit the goals I set for last month. I practiced a total of 50.45 hours in March, averaging 1.62 hours (or just over an hour and a half) per day. Realistically, I practice about 45 minutes to an hour a day on weekdays, and I usually get at least one longer practice (or multiple shorter practices) in on one or both days of the weekend to bring the average up. CLASSICAL GOALS Chopin, F Minor Nocturne March Goal: Have entire piece by memory and performance-ready. I have about 90% of the piece by memory, but I still have some work to do before it's performance-ready. The only two sections that I don't quite have are "The Agitation" and the "stretto" section with the seventh chords. I'll work on both this week and will have them both memorized before the weekend. April Goal: Finish memorizing, and polish, polish, polish! My focus now is really on phrasing and dynamics. I have the notes down, even in the difficult passages. Fro...
Post a Comment
Read more

Thursday, July 13

I worked in a short practice today. Had piano this afternoon. The short practice involved the usual scales and arps, and a run-through of my pieces. It wasn't so much a practice as a review. Piano was good. She said that the Bach sounded very musical. I asked what I should do next, practice-wise--continue drilling and memorizing HS, or start HT? She said that I "shouldn't hold off any longer" on playing HT, and to keep drilling HS if I want but to begin working HT on whatever I find to be the most difficult passage of the fugue. That's easy. I don't have the music in front of me, but in the Alfred edition, it's the bottom of page two. I played the Liszt pretty well, if a bit timidly. I'm playing it with emotion and paying attention to all of the dynamics and all of that, but I'm still also trying to make sure I get the notes right in several sections. She had all kinds of nice things to say about the Liszt. The 9-against-4 is sounding much better (...
Post a Comment
Read more

I Need an Intermediate Piece

Deborah wants me to pick out an intermediate piece to start learning next week. I went to the ARCT Syllabus guide that Robert so graciously sent me and looked up all of the pieces that I considered "intermediate." They were mostly Grade 6 and Grade 7. Not intermediate enough. I looked up my Beethoven Sonatina in G, my most recent intermediate piece. It's a Grade 3--a very early intermediate. So I'm looking for something in the Grade 4-5 category. And I'd kind of like to work on one of those pieces that everyone loves to hear--Fur Elise, Chopin's Em prelude, the Brahms waltz in Ab--all pieces I learned in junior high, but pieces that I'd like to re-learn, and learn to play well , and not like my junior-high self, whose heart wasn't in the music. And they are pieces I love, and that others love hearing as well. Hmm. Fur Elise is Grade 7. The Chopin Prelude is Grade 8. The Brahms Waltz is Grade 8. Too advanced for an intermediate piece? I'll talk it ...
3 comments
Read more